From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lickliter v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 1, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-01931-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-01931-GMN-NJK

03-01-2013

JAMES LICKLITER, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY PLAN

(Docket No. 19)

Pending before the Court is Defendant's proposed discovery plan, Docket No. 19, which is DENIED without prejudice. The Court appreciates Defendant's efforts to comply with the deadline imposed by the Court to file a revised proposed discovery plan. But, as Plaintiff's counsel is apparently unavailable to confer on the proposed plan until next week and so that it may be filed as a stipulated plan, the Court extends the deadline to file a revised discovery plan to March 8, 2013. Accordingly, the parties are ordered, no later than March 8, 2013, to file a stipulated proposed discovery plan that either (1) is based on the 180-day discovery period outlined in Local Rule 26-1(e)(1) or (2) provides explanation why a longer period should be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

NANCY J. KOPPE

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Lickliter v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 1, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-01931-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2013)
Case details for

Lickliter v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LICKLITER, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 1, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-01931-GMN-NJK (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2013)