Argued January 22, 1906
Decided February 6, 1906
Maulsby Kimball for appellant.
August Becker for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, O'BRIEN, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, WERNER and CHASE, JJ. Not sitting: HISCOCK, J.
Full title:MEYER LICHTENSTEIN, Respondent, v . HARRY RABOLINSKY, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Feb 6, 1906
On a sale by description liability depends much on whether inspection will disclose defects. ( Lichtenstein…
Eddington v. DickA purchaser is not under a duty to amply investigate property before purchasing it where the contract of sale…