From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lichtenstein v. Perfit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1998
248 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 23, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them since there are material issues of fact which require a trial ( see, CPLR 3212 [b]).

Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Joy, Altman and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lichtenstein v. Perfit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 23, 1998
248 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Lichtenstein v. Perfit

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM LICHTENSTEIN et al., Respondents, v. RICHARD PERFIT et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
669 N.Y.S.2d 918