Licensing v. Berry

Full title: THOMSON LICENSING SA, Plaintiff, v. OVINGTON JACK BEERY, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Jan 20, 2006

Case No. 3:02cv00311 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 20, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:02cv00311.

January 20, 2006

ORDER

THOMAS ROSE, District Judge

The Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington (Doc. #217), to whom this case was originally referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby adopts said Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendations filed on December 28, 2005 (Doc. #217) is ADOPTED in full;

2. Plaintiff Thomson Licensing SA's Motion For Relief From Judgment So As To Allow Appeal (Doc. #208) is DENIED without prejudice; and

3. This case remains terminated on the docket of this Court.