From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Licardo v. Rothas

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Mar 1, 2004
C-022846 MMC, C-023045 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2004)

Opinion

          PETER OTTENWELLER, SBN #102213, Attorney at Law, Santa Rosa, California, Attorney for Plaintiff, CELESTE LICARDO.

          JEFFREY D. DURRA, Attorney for Plaintiff, COUNTY OF SONOMA COUNTY.

          DAVID H. BREMER, Attorney for Defendants, MICHAEL DAVID ROTHAS and AMERICAN RED CROSS.

          Timothy C. Hamilton, Santa Rosa, CA.

          Robert H. Gold, San Francisco, CA.


         

          MAXINE CHESNEY, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(1)(1).


Summaries of

Licardo v. Rothas

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Mar 1, 2004
C-022846 MMC, C-023045 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2004)
Case details for

Licardo v. Rothas

Case Details

Full title:CELESTE LICARDO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL DAVID ROTHAS, ET AL Defendants…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Mar 1, 2004

Citations

C-022846 MMC, C-023045 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 1, 2004)