Opinion
No. 2008-02449.
February 3, 2009.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants Jeremy V. Joseph and Budget Rent-A-Car, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated January 24, 2008, which, in effect, denied that branch of their motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).
Carman, Callahan Ingham, LLP, Farmingdale, N.Y. (James M. Carman and Michael F. Ingham of counsel), for appellants.
Lever Stolzenberg, LLP, White Plains, N.Y. (David Lever and Terence James Cortelli of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Fisher, J.P., Covello, Balkin and Belen, JJ.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The appellants failed to make a prima facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) as a result of the subject accident (see Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345, 350; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957). In her bill of particulars, the plaintiff alleged that as a result of the accident, she sustained certain injuries to, inter alia, her cervical spine, lumbar spine, and right knee. The appellants failed to establish prima facie that these alleged injuries were not causally related to the accident, or were not serious within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) ( see McKenzie v Redl, 47 AD3d 775, 776-777; Dettori v Molzon, 306 AD2d 308, 309; Julemis v Gates, 281 AD2d 396).
Since the appellants failed to meet their initial burden of establishing their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, it is unnecessary to consider the sufficiency of the plaintiffs papers in opposition ( see McKenzie v Redl, 47 AD3d at 777; Dettori v Molzon, 306 AD2d at 309; Julemis v Gates, 281 AD2d at 396-397).