Opinion
Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 2003.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency Nos. A75-318-374, A75-318-375.
Joren Lyons, Angela M. Bean & Associates, San Francisco, CA, Robert Kuan Liang, pro se, Chun-Mei Hsu Liang, pro se, San Bruno, CA, for Petitioners.
Regional Counsel, Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, San Francisco, CA, Jamie M. Dowd, Anthony W. Norwood, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Immigration Litigation, Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: HUG, B. FLETCHER, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Petitioners challenge the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") denial of their motion to reopen, which argued that they received ineffective assistance of counsel. At oral argument, petitioners' current
Page 578.
counsel conceded that this case is governed by our recent decision in Vasquez-Zavala v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107-08 (9th Cir.2003), and that as a result, the BIA judgment should be affirmed. We therefore deny the petition for review.
AFFIRMED.