Summary
In Kaba, the court construed the ERAP statute as prohibiting even the "[t]he pursu[it] of an eviction case during the window period, 12-months after the acceptance of ERAP funds," and dismissed the proceeding on the basis that service of a notice of termination was an "act[] designed to cause an eviction" in violation of the statute.
Summary of this case from 417 E. Realty LLC v. KejriwalOpinion
Index No. LT-050197-22/QU
03-13-2023
Ordered accordingly