Li Yun Griffith v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Full title: Li Yun Griffith, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Court: United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 4, 2022

No. 14667-20S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 4, 2022)

Opinion

14667-20S

03-04-2022

Li Yun Griffith, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Peter J. Panuthos, Special Trial Judge.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION

Peter J. Panuthos, Special Trial Judge.

On January 14, 2022, respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution. This case was called from the calendar, on February 22, 2022, at the remote trial session of the Court for cases in which New York, New York was the place of trial. There was no appearance by or on behalf of petitioner. Counsel for respondent appeared and was heard. Upon due consideration and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceeding, it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is further

ORDERED that, in addition to regular service, a copy of this Order of Dismissal and Decision be served on petitioner at 350 W. 42^nd St., Apt. 32H, New York, New York 10036-6958. It is further

ORDERED and DECIDED that the Notice of Determination Concerning Relief From Joint And Several Liability Under Section 6015(f) dated October 27, 2020, upon which this case is based, is sustained. 1