From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LI v. CHERTOFF

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Aug 16, 2007
8:07CV50 (D. Neb. Aug. 16, 2007)

Opinion

8:07CV50.

August 16, 2007


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on defendants' motion for reconsideration (Filing No. 22). The Court has concluded that courts have jurisdiction at a minimum under the APA because defendants have a duty to process the I-485 application within a reasonable time, as distinct from its discretionary authority of whether to grant or deny the applications. The Court finds such a duty exists, particularly under the facts and circumstances of this case. For these reasons, defendants' motion will be denied. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion for reconsideration is denied.


Summaries of

LI v. CHERTOFF

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Aug 16, 2007
8:07CV50 (D. Neb. Aug. 16, 2007)
Case details for

LI v. CHERTOFF

Case Details

Full title:QIJUAN LI and BRIAN S. HELMOWSKI, Plaintiffs, v. MICHAEL CHERTOFF…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Aug 16, 2007

Citations

8:07CV50 (D. Neb. Aug. 16, 2007)