From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Schack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 29, 2012
98 A.D.3d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-08-29

In the Matter of Henry F. LEWIS, et al., petitioners, v. Arthur M. SCHACK, etc., et al., respondents.

Cozen O'Connor, New York, N.Y. (Kenneth Fisher of counsel), for petitioners. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Andrew H. Meier of counsel), for respondent Arthur M. Schack.


Cozen O'Connor, New York, N.Y. (Kenneth Fisher of counsel), for petitioners. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Andrew H. Meier of counsel), for respondent Arthur M. Schack.
Torgan Cooper & Aaron, P.C. (Pollack Pollack Isaac & DeCicco, New York, N.Y. [Brian J. Isaac], of counsel), for respondent Shirly Miller.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent Arthur M. Schack, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to take certain action in connection with a motion made in an underlying civil action entitled Miller v. Lewis pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 11358/09.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied as academic, and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The instant proceeding has been rendered academic in light of the motion schedule fixed in the underlying matter by the respondentArthur M. Schack.

DICKERSON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, BELEN and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Schack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 29, 2012
98 A.D.3d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Lewis v. Schack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Henry F. LEWIS, et al., petitioners, v. Arthur M. SCHACK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 29, 2012

Citations

98 A.D.3d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6077
950 N.Y.S.2d 487