From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Navient Solutions, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Oct 14, 2015
618 F. App'x 301 (8th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 15-2100

10-14-2015

James Melvin Lewis Plaintiff - Appellant v. Navient Solutions, Inc., formerly known as Sallie Mae, Inc. Defendant - Appellee


Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City [Unpublished] Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

James Lewis brought this pro se action against Navient Solutions, Inc., asserting violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, among other claims. He appeals from the orders of the District Court granting summary judgment in favor of Navient and denying his post-judgment motion under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. --------

We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties' arguments on appeal, and we conclude that summary judgment was properly granted. See Anderson v. EMC Mortg. Corp., 631 F.3d 905, 906 (8th Cir. 2011) (reviewing the grant of summary judgment de novo). We further conclude that the denial of post-judgment relief was not an abuse of discretion. See Innovative Home Health Care, Inc. v. P.T.-O.T. Assocs. of the Black Hills, 141 F.3d 1284, 1286 (8th Cir. 1998) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Navient Solutions, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
Oct 14, 2015
618 F. App'x 301 (8th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Lewis v. Navient Solutions, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:James Melvin Lewis Plaintiff - Appellant v. Navient Solutions, Inc.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 14, 2015

Citations

618 F. App'x 301 (8th Cir. 2015)

Citing Cases

Scott v. Anderson (In re Scott)

The record supports the bankruptcy court's decision that the Debtors showed no manifest error of law,…

Perry v. Cox Commc'ns

For the sake of completeness, the Court notes there is no private cause of action against a furnisher under §…