Opinion
August 31, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 902 for a determination that the action may be maintained as a class action ( see, Karlin v. IVF Am., 239 A.D.2d 562). The evidence in the record indicates that the plaintiff is not a suitable representative of the proposed class ( see, CPLR 901 [a] [4]).
Bracken, J.P., Copertino, Santucci, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.