From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Asset Acceptance, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
May 17, 2012
3:11-CV-01546-PK (D. Or. May. 17, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-CV-01546-PK

05-17-2012

NNENNA LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC, and HARRINGTON, ANDERSON & DEBLASIO, LLC Defendants.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#16) on April 6, 2012, in which he recommends this Court deny as moot Defendants' Motion (#6) to Dismiss, deny Defendants' alternative Motion (#6) to Strike, and deny Defendants' constructive Motion (#11) to Dismiss. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)(en banc). See also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#16). Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot Defendants' Motion (#6) to Dismiss, DENIES Defendants' alternative Motion (#6) to Strike, and DENIES Defendants' constructive Motion (#11) to Dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lewis v. Asset Acceptance, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
May 17, 2012
3:11-CV-01546-PK (D. Or. May. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Lewis v. Asset Acceptance, LLC

Case Details

Full title:NNENNA LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. ASSET ACCEPTANCE, LLC, and HARRINGTON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: May 17, 2012

Citations

3:11-CV-01546-PK (D. Or. May. 17, 2012)