From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Levescy v. Crocker

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas
Aug 7, 1979
585 S.W.2d 337 (Tex. Civ. App. 1979)

Opinion

No. 19979.

June 27, 1979. Rehearing Denied August 7, 1979.

Appeal from the 305th District Court, Dallas County, Pat McClung, J.

Warren Hays, Law Offices of Jack Napier, Dallas, for appellant.

Toby L. Gerber, Berman, Fichtner Mitchell, Dallas, for appellee.

Before ROBERTSON, CARVER and STOREY, JJ.


Rita Levescy appeals from a judgment dismissing a paternity suit, filed by her on behalf of her minor son against James Crocker. The trial court held that the suit was barred by Tex.Fam Code Ann. § 13.01 (Vernon Supp. 1978-1979) which provides that a suit to establish paternity must be brought before the child is one year old. We conclude the suit was not barred, as section 13.01 cannot be applied retroactively, and reverse and remand.

The minor child was born out of wedlock on September 5, 1974. Section 13.01 did not become effective until September 1, 1975. This proceeding was filed on June 29, 1978. We must conclude from the trial court's judgment, as well as the findings of fact and conclusions of law filed upon request of appellant, that the trial court deemed section 13.01 to apply retroactively to children born prior to September 1, 1975 with the same force as it applied prospectively to children born after that date.

The trial court's order of dismissal is erroneous and requires reversal under this court's opinion in Texas Department of Human Resources v. Delley, 581 So.2d 519 (Tex.Civ.App. Dallas 1979, writ ref'd n.t.e.), in which it was held that section 13.01 applies only to children born after September 1, 1975, the effective date of that provision.

In Delley, the court held that the proper statute of limitations applying to causes for determining paternity for children born prior to September 1, 1975 was the general four-year statute of limitations applicable to all causes of action of which a specific limitation was not otherwise applied by statute. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5535 (Vernon Supp. 1978-1979). Further, in Delley, the court held that children born prior to September 1, 1975, and subject to the four-year statute, would have the benefit of tolling statutes so long as the child was under the disability of minority. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 5535 (Vernon Supp. 1978-1979). We hold that the opinion in Delley controls the disposition of this appeal. See also State Department of Public Welfare v. Martin, 562 S.W.2d 9 (Tex.Civ.App. Eastland 1978, no writ); Catchings v. Hamm, 560 S.W.2d 194 (Tex.Civ.App. Waco 1977, no writ); Alvarado v. Gonzales, 552 S.W.2d 539 (Tex.Civ.App. Corpus Christi 1977, no writ). Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Levescy v. Crocker

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas
Aug 7, 1979
585 S.W.2d 337 (Tex. Civ. App. 1979)
Case details for

Levescy v. Crocker

Case Details

Full title:Rita Rochelle LEVESCY, Appellant, v. James F. CROCKER, Appellee

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas

Date published: Aug 7, 1979

Citations

585 S.W.2d 337 (Tex. Civ. App. 1979)

Citing Cases

Magee v. G&H Towing Co.

The Magees raised five issues in their prior appeal: (1) G&H's summary judgment motion did not address all of…

In re Estate of Chavana

Some courts, addressing paternity suits (not heirship suits), have held this to be the case. See Perry v.…