From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leslie v. Melton

United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Oct 6, 2011
CIV-11-270-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Oct. 6, 2011)

Opinion

CIV-11-270-RAW-KEW.

October 6, 2011


OPINION AND ORDER


Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent is hereby ordered to show cause why the writ should not issue by filing within thirty (30) days an answer to the petition, in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. As an alternative to filing a Rule 5 answer, Respondent may file within thirty (30) days a motion to dismiss based upon 28 U.S.C. § 2244, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, or other applicable statute. Extensions of time will be granted for good cause only, and in no event for longer than an additional twenty (20) days. Petitioner may submit a reply to the Respondent's answer or motion within fifteen (15) days after the filing of Respondent's pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Leslie v. Melton

United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Oct 6, 2011
CIV-11-270-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Oct. 6, 2011)
Case details for

Leslie v. Melton

Case Details

Full title:Sidney J. Leslie, Petitioner, v. Janice Melton, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

CIV-11-270-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Oct. 6, 2011)