From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lescallett v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-0061 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-0061 KJM CKD P

02-13-2013

DARRELL JUNIOR LESCALLETT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MCDONALD, Defendant.


ORDER

On January 4, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion asking that the court enforce the terms of the settlement agreement he reached with defendants McDonald, Gamberg and Vanleer. In his motion, plaintiff asserts he has not yet received the payment agreed upon in the settlement. In their opposition, defendants present evidence indicating plaintiff has been paid. Plaintiff has not filed a reply to defendants' opposition. In light of the record before the court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's "motion for enforcement of judgement" (Dkt. No. 32) is denied.

____________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lescallett v. McDonald

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2013
No. 2:11-cv-0061 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Lescallett v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:DARRELL JUNIOR LESCALLETT, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MCDONALD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-0061 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)