Opinion
21-CV-4746 (LT S)
09-16-2021
STEVEN LESANE, Plaintiff, v. NYPD 043 PRECINCT JOHN DOE 1, et al., Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING ORIGINAL SIGNATURE
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff brings this action pro se. By order dated July 26, 2021, the Court dismissed the complaint, but granted Plaintiff thirty days' leave to replead his claims. (ECF 6.) On August 23, 2021, the Court received from Plaintiff a type-written submission without a signature. (ECF 7.) Because Plaintiff's submission appears to be an attempt to comply with the Court's July 26, 2021 order, the Court construes the submission as an amended complaint.
Rule 11(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's name - or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.” See also Local Civil Rule 11.1(a). The Supreme Court has interpreted Rule 11(a) to require “as it did in John Hancock's day, a name handwritten (or a mark handplaced).” Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 764 (2001).
To cure this filing deficiency, the Court directs Plaintiff to submit the attached declaration with his original signature to the Court within thirty days of the date of this order.
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. No. summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).
SO ORDERED.