From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leopold v. Richard Bertram Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 29, 1972
265 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Opinion

No. 72-758.

August 29, 1972.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, John J. Kehoe, J.

Shutts Bowen and Richard M. Leslie, Miami, for appellants.

Dixon, Dixon, Lane Mitchell, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, C.J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.


By this interlocutory appeal we are called upon to review the propriety of a temporary injunction. Without passing on the merits, we reverse the order granting the temporary injunction because same failed to provide for the posting of a bond. Metropolitan Dade County v. Polk Pools, Inc., Fla.App. 1960, 124 So.2d 737; Hoffman v. White, Fla.App. 1970, 235 So.2d 43; Berry v. Morgan Adhesives Co., Fla.App. 1972, 262 So.2d 691; Rule 1.610(b), R.C.P., 31 F.S.A.


Summaries of

Leopold v. Richard Bertram Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 29, 1972
265 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
Case details for

Leopold v. Richard Bertram Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN N. LEOPOLD ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. RICHARD BERTRAM CO., A FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 29, 1972

Citations

265 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)

Citing Cases

Tri-Plaza Corporation v. N.R. Field

We reverse the order granting temporary injunction for the following reasons: 1. No bond was required by the…

Sunrise Point, Inc. v. Foss

In this instance those standards include the requirement of such a bond. See e.g., Leopold v. Richard Bertram…