Opinion
2:10-cv-00180-PMP-LRL
01-14-2013
MICHAEL LEONETTI, Petitioner, v. BRIAN WILLIAMS, et al., Respondents.
ORDER
This action is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, by a Nevada state prisoner represented by counsel.
On March 29, 2010, the Court entered an order dismissing this action. (ECF No. 5). The Clerk of Court entered judgment on March 30, 2010. (ECF No. 6). Petitioner filed a notice of appeal. (ECF No. 7). On August 22, 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit entered an unpublished memorandum opinion reversing and remanding this case. (ECF No. 17). The Court of Appeals entered mandate on September 14, 2012 (ECF No. 18), and on September 17, 2012, recalled the mandate (ECF No. 19). On November 15, 2012, the Court of Appeals again issued mandate. (ECF No. 22). This Court entered its order on mandate on November 27, 2012. (ECF No. 24).
On January 14, 2013, a status conference was held before this Court, at which time petitioner was directed to file an amended petition not later than April 15, 2013. (ECF No. 25). Respondents were directed to file their response to the amended petition not later than June 1, 2013. (Id.).By way of this order, the Court further directs the parties, as specified below.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties SHALL CONFER on the filing of transcripts and all relevant portions of the state court record. The parties shall make all attempts to file one set of exhibits that comprise the state court record, rather than submitting two separate sets of exhibits.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, once one party has filed exhibits comprising the state court record, any additional exhibits filed SHALL BE numbered in sequential order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties SHALL SEND courtesy (paper) copies of all exhibits presented in support of the amended petition and the response to the amended petition to the Reno Division of this Court. Courtesy copies shall be mailed to the Clerk of Court, 400 S. Virginia St., Reno, NV, 89501, and directed to the attention of "Staff Attorney" on the outside of the mailing address label. Moreover, in the future, all parties shall provide courtesy copies of any additional exhibits submitted to the Court in this case, in the manner described above.
______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE