From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leonard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 12, 2009
1 So. 3d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Opinion

No. 1D07-4109.

February 12, 2009.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Escambia County, Frank Bell, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Natalie D. Kirk, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


We agree with the parties that because the knowledge element for the charge of resisting arrest without violence was disputed at trial, the trial court committed fundamental error by failing to instruct the jury on that element. See Hams v. State, 935 So.2d 1259, 1262 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (finding the failure to instruct the jury on the knowledge element of resisting an officer without violence warrants reversal when the defendant presented evidence that he was unaware he was struggling with officers). Therefore, we reverse Appellant's conviction for resisting arrest without violence and remand for a new trial on that charge. Because our reversal affects the sentence for Appellant's remaining conviction of cocaine possession, we reverse the sentence on the remaining conviction and remand for resentencing.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED with instructions consistent with this opinion.

WEBSTER, and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Leonard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 12, 2009
1 So. 3d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)
Case details for

Leonard v. State

Case Details

Full title:Derricko LEONARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 12, 2009

Citations

1 So. 3d 1271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)

Citing Cases

Lowery v. State

Appellant's testimony established that at the time any alleged resistance occurred, she was aware that the…

Lett v. State

As the state concedes, the trial court committed fundamental error by failing to instruct the jury on the…