From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leonakis v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 1987
126 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

January 26, 1987

Appeal from the Court of Claims (Lengyel, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The claimant Joyce Leonakis was injured when her bicycle skidded on ice on a bicycle path at Rockland Lake State Park. The park is located in a highly populated suburban community, and includes two golf courses, at least one swimming pool, and tennis courts.

The State seeks to dismiss the instant claim based upon its contention that General Obligations Law § 9-103 shields it from liability in the absence of any allegations of willful or malicious conduct. We disagree.

The Court of Appeals recently determined that General Obligations Law § 9-103 does not afford immunity to a municipality in the maintenance of a supervised public park and recreational facility such as the one here (see, Ferres v. City of New Rochelle, 68 N.Y.2d 446). The court noted that the sole purpose of the statute is to encourage landowners to allow their properties to be used by the public for a limited number of outdoor recreational activities, and its contemplated application was to undeveloped or wilderness areas. The Court of Appeals rejected the suggestion that General Obligations Law § 9-103 provides for the drastic reduction in a municipality's responsibility in the operation and maintenance of its supervised parks, saying no discernible public interest would be served by such construction.

As in Ferres (supra), the park in question in the instant case is one in which the public is already encouraged to engage in recreational activities of all kinds, and the State has undertaken the duty that the law imposes in the operation and maintenance of supervised park facilities (see, Preston v. State of New York, 59 N.Y.2d 997). Under these circumstances, the application of General Obligations Law § 9-103 is unwarranted, and the Court of Claims properly denied the motion to dismiss. Mangano, J.P., Brown, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Leonakis v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 26, 1987
126 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Leonakis v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOYCE LEONAKIS et al., Respondents, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 26, 1987

Citations

126 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Meyer v. County of Orange

Hence, the application of the statute herein would foster an unreasonable result by requiring the county to…

Masone v. State

Claimants failed to demonstrate that childish or other foreseeably unreasonable dirt bikers were known users…