From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leo v. Nev. Div. of Parole & Prob.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 9, 2017
2:16-cv-02492-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2017)

Opinion

2:16-cv-02492-JAD-VCF

02-09-2017

Nil Leo, Plaintiff v. Nevada Division of Parole and Probation, Defendant


Order Adopting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing and Closing Case

[ECF No. 3]

On January 1, 2017, the magistrate judge granted Nil Leo's application to proceed in forma pauperis and recommended that I dismiss Leo's complaint with leave to amend. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed." Objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation were due by January 20, 2017, and Leo has not filed an objection or requested an extension to do so.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 3] is ADOPTED. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.

Dated this 9th day of February, 2017.

/s/_________

Jennifer A. Dorsey

United States District Judge

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).


Summaries of

Leo v. Nev. Div. of Parole & Prob.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Feb 9, 2017
2:16-cv-02492-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2017)
Case details for

Leo v. Nev. Div. of Parole & Prob.

Case Details

Full title:Nil Leo, Plaintiff v. Nevada Division of Parole and Probation, Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Feb 9, 2017

Citations

2:16-cv-02492-JAD-VCF (D. Nev. Feb. 9, 2017)