From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leo v. Gugliotta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To grant summary judgment, it must clearly appear that no material, triable issue of fact is presented (Daliendo v Johnson, 147 A.D.2d 312). The summary judgment movant must establish his or her cause of action or defense sufficiently to warrant a court's granting judgment in its favor as a matter of law. On the other hand, the opposing party must produce evidentiary proof in admissible form sufficient to require a trial of material issues of fact (see, Frank Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co., 70 N.Y.2d 966).

Review of the record in this case demonstrates that the award of summary judgment in favor of the defendant Hildegarde Thompson was proper (see, Rebecchi v. Whitmore, 172 A.D.2d 600). Balletta, J.P., Thompson, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Leo v. Gugliotta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 27, 1995
212 A.D.2d 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Leo v. Gugliotta

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES A. LEO et al., Plaintiffs, v. MARIA M. GUGLIOTTA et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 27, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 856

Citing Cases

Shapiro v. Rockville Country Club, Inc.

Zuckerman v. City of New York, supra; Davenport v. County of Nassau, 279 A.D.2d 497 (2nd Dept., 2001); and…

MATTER OF JOACHIM v. Flanzig

) Once the party seeking summary judgment has made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a…