From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lenehan v. Hamilton Storage Warehouse Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
May 1, 1900
31 Misc. 767 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

May, 1900.

Joseph Berheld, for appellant.

Benjamin Baker, for respondent.


The plaintiff's case depends entirely upon her uncorroborated testimony, which it is evident the jury did not believe. The plaintiff's story is of such a nature that we cannot say that the jury was not warranted in not believing it. It is evident that the jury believed that the plaintiff received from the defendant all the goods that she had delivered to the defendant.

There were no errors made on the trial by the learned trial justice that call for a reversal of the judgment.

Present: TRUAX, P.J., SCOTT and DUGRO, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Lenehan v. Hamilton Storage Warehouse Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
May 1, 1900
31 Misc. 767 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Lenehan v. Hamilton Storage Warehouse Co.

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE LENEHAN, Appellant, v . THE HAMILTON STORAGE WAREHOUSE CO.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: May 1, 1900

Citations

31 Misc. 767 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)