From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lemus v. Apker

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Feb 28, 2011
No. 10-CV-101-TUC-AWT (D. Ariz. Feb. 28, 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-CV-101-TUC-AWT.

February 28, 2011


ORDER


This order addresses the habeas corpus petition and Motion for Summary Judgment by Petitioner Demetrius Lemus. On January 5, 2011, after a thorough and well documented analysis, Magistrate Judge Marshall issued a Report and Recommendation ("R R") to this Court. Neither party filed an objection to the R R. Magistrate Judge Marshall recommended that this Court both dismiss the petition and deny the motion.

When there are no objections to the R R, the Court will modify or set aside only those portions that are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). The Court has carefully reviewed the entire record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Marshall's recommendations are not clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Marshall (Doc. No. 22) is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case.

DATED this 28th day of February, 2011.


Summaries of

Lemus v. Apker

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Feb 28, 2011
No. 10-CV-101-TUC-AWT (D. Ariz. Feb. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Lemus v. Apker

Case Details

Full title:Demetrius Lemus, Petitioner, v. Lionel C. Apker, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Feb 28, 2011

Citations

No. 10-CV-101-TUC-AWT (D. Ariz. Feb. 28, 2011)