From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lemmer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1929
225 App. Div. 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

January, 1929.


Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers affirmed, with costs. ( Lindblom v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., 210 App. Div. 177, 179; Kelly v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 15 id. 220, 222.) Rich, Young, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., dissents upon the ground that plaintiff did not perform the terms of the policy on her part to be performed. Proof of death filed under one policy is not a compliance with the terms of another policy upon the same life, at least where the beneficiary in each policy is a different person. There was no proof of waiver.


Summaries of

Lemmer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1929
225 App. Div. 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Lemmer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:HESTER LEMMER, as Administratrix, etc., of RUSSELL P. LEMMER, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1929

Citations

225 App. Div. 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Howell v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.

That the proof was thus furnished by the beneficiary, rather than by the administrator, is immaterial…

Howell v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.

The policies did not require that proofs of claim should be presented by any specific person or while acting…