From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Legette v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 21, 1997
694 So. 2d 826 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 95-03100

Opinion filed May 21, 1997.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Robert J. Simms, Judge.

William E. Taylor, Tampa, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anne E. Sheer, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Albert Legette appeals his judgment and sentences following his convictions of attempted robbery with a firearm and improper exhibition of a firearm.

Mr. Legette contends that the dual convictions constitute a double jeopardy violation. Despite the state's concession of error on this issue, we conclude these two offenses each require proof of an element that the other does not. § 775.021(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993); Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932). Robbery requires that force, violence, or fear be used during the course of the offense. § 812.13, Fla. Stat. (1993). By contrast, improper exhibition requires neither force, violence, or fear. § 790.10, Fla. Stat. (1993). Improper exhibition is established when a weapon is exhibited in a rude, careless, angry, or threatening manner, whereas robbery does not require exhibition of the weapon in such a manner. Cf. Kase v. State, 581 So.2d 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (no double jeopardy violation for convictions of improper exhibition of a weapon and aggravated assault). Because the elements required to prove improper exhibition of a firearm are not subsumed in the attempted robbery with a firearm, these convictions do not result in a double jeopardy violation.

We also approve the trial court's imposition of the three-year minimum mandatory sentence for Mr. Legette's conviction for attempted robbery with a firearm. Although Mr. Legette was 20 years old when he committed this first offense, the trial court properly exercised its discretion in declining to impose a youthful offender sentence. See § 958.021, Fla. Stat. (1993);Ellis v. State, 475 So.2d 1021, 1023 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Legette v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 21, 1997
694 So. 2d 826 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Legette v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT LEGETTE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 21, 1997

Citations

694 So. 2d 826 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. State

Affirmed. See State v. Maxwell, 682 So. 2d 83 (Fla. 1996); Melvin v. State, 645 So. 2d 448 (Fla. 1994);…

Shannon v. State

Affirmed. See 921.0012(3)(i), Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. Maxwell, 682 So.2d 83 (Fla. 1996); Legette v.…