From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leeder v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jan 14, 2014
No. 04-13-00380-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2014)

Opinion

No. 04-13-00380-CV Trial Court Case No. 09-364

01-14-2014

Floyd Leeder II and Kimberly Leeder, Appellants v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. as Trustee and Barclays Capital Real Estate, Inc. d/b/a HomeQ Servicing, Appellees


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on February 4, 2014, to the following panel: Justice Barnard, Justice Martinez, and Justice Alvarez. All parties will be notified of the Court's decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 48.

Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED on January 14, 2014.

__________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this January 14, 2014.

__________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk


Summaries of

Leeder v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jan 14, 2014
No. 04-13-00380-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2014)
Case details for

Leeder v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

Case Details

Full title:Floyd Leeder II and Kimberly Leeder, Appellants v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A…

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Jan 14, 2014

Citations

No. 04-13-00380-CV (Tex. App. Jan. 14, 2014)