From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 28, 1942
158 S.W.2d 499 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)

Opinion

No. 21824.

Delivered December 17, 1941. On Motion to Reinstate Appeal January 28, 1942.

1. — Statement of Facts — Trial Court's Approval.

A statement of facts not approved by the trial court cannot be considered by the Court of Criminal Appeals.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.

2. — Murder Without Malice — Evidence.

Evidence held sufficient to sustain conviction of murder without malice.

3. — Murder Without Malice — Sentence Reformed — Indeterminate Sentence Law.

Where defendant was convicted of murder without malice and given four years in the penitentiary by the verdict of the jury, and was sentenced by the trial court to not less than four nor more than four years in the penitentiary, sentence reformed, in accordance with the indeterminate sentence law, so as to confine defendant in the penitentiary for not less than two years nor more than four years, and, as reformed, judgment affirmed.

Appeal from District Court of Cherokee County. Hon. J. W. Chandler, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for murder, without malice; penalty, confinement in penitentiary for four years.

Reformed and affirmed.

The opinion states the case.

D. L. Harry, of Jacksonville, for appellant.

Spurgeon E. Bell, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The appeal is from a sentence of four years in the penitentiary on a charge of murder assessed upon a jury verdict in Cherokee County.

Statement of facts in this cause is not approved by the court and, therefore, cannot be considered. The record contains no sentence passed by the court in accordance with the judgment and we find no notice of appeal in the record.

This court has no jurisdiction of any matter presented in this appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE APPEAL.


This cause was heretofore dismissed because no sentence and no notice of appeal were found in the record. These defects have been remedied, it being shown to have been an oversight upon the part of the clerk making up the transcript, and a proper sentence and notice of appeal being now shown, the judgment of this court dismissing such appeal is set aside, and the cause will be decided upon its merits.

A statement of facts signed and approved by the trial court, and timely filed in the court below, is also now present in the record. There are no bills of exception in the record.

The salient facts presented are briefly that Jesse Lee and Levanna Lee were husband and wife, and Gertha Jones was the wife of Anderson Jones, the deceased. That after a meeting at a negro church, Gertha, the wife of deceased, requested that Levanna Lee, who was her sister, and Jesse Lee, Levanna's husband, accompany Gertha home, she being afraid of the deceased. That they started off together, when the deceased accosted them and demanded that Gertha go home with him. That an argument ensued, and the deceased picked up a rock and threatened to hit his wife with it; that Jesse Lee finally threw the deceased down and somebody used a knife, the blade finally being broken out of said knife; that Levanna Lee was on top of the deceased, and she called for Gertha to give her a razor. Gertha produced the razor and gave same to Levanna. Jesse Lee then told Levanna to "cut his throat," and she replied, "I can't do it"; he then said "Give it to me," and Jesse took the razor and cut Jones' throat, and then Levanna caught "the body by the hand and threw it several feet and turned it over on the face."

A merciful jury found the two women guilty of murder without malice, and a five-year sentence, which was suspended during good behavior. Jesse Lee was found guilty of murder without malice and given four years in the penitentiary, and his sentence was not suspended, hence his appeal.

The trial court failed to observe the provisions of the indeterminate sentence law and sentenced Jesse Lee, the appellant, to not less than four nor more than four years in the penitentiary.

We think the facts are sufficient to support the verdict herein against the appellant. The sentence is hereby reformed so as to confine appellant in the penitentiary in this cause not less than two years nor more than four years, and as reformed the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Lee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 28, 1942
158 S.W.2d 499 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)
Case details for

Lee v. State

Case Details

Full title:JESSE LEE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 28, 1942

Citations

158 S.W.2d 499 (Tex. Crim. App. 1942)
158 S.W.2d 499