From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Spears

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 28, 2013
2:12-cv-01397-LRH-CWH (D. Nev. Jan. 28, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-cv-01397-LRH-CWH

01-28-2013

DAVID LEE, Plaintiff, v. DARCY SPEARS, Defendant.


ORDER

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman (#6) entered on November 6, 2012, recommending dismissing the complaint with prejudice. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#6) entered on November 6, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#6) entered on November 6, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's Complaint (#5) is DISMISSED with prejudice because Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint within 30 days of the Court's October 4, 2012 order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______

LARRY R. HICKS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lee v. Spears

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 28, 2013
2:12-cv-01397-LRH-CWH (D. Nev. Jan. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Lee v. Spears

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LEE, Plaintiff, v. DARCY SPEARS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 28, 2013

Citations

2:12-cv-01397-LRH-CWH (D. Nev. Jan. 28, 2013)