From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 22, 1971
181 S.E.2d 364 (Ga. 1971)

Opinion

26343.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 9, 1971.

DECIDED APRIL 22, 1971.

Habeas corpus. Tattnall Superior Court. Before Judge Caswell.

Milford Lee, pro se. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Assistant Attorney General, Courtney Wilder Stanton, William R. Childers, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.


The appeal here is from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus by the Judge of Tattnall Superior Court. Appellant was convicted of the offense of murder on March 30, 1954, and sentenced to life imprisonment. In June, 1970, he filed the present application for habeas corpus in which his only contention was that the constitutional guarantee of due process was denied him in that on the trial his sole defense was alibi and the court instructed the jury in the usual manner as to this defense, placing upon him the burden of proving the defense of alibi to the reasonable satisfaction of the jury. Under the rulings of this court in Shoemake v. Whitlock, 226 Ga. 771 ( 177 S.E.2d 677), and Thornton v. State, 226 Ga. 837 ( 178 S.E.2d 193), the trial court did not err in denying the writ and in remanding the prisoner to the custody of the warden.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 9, 1971 — DECIDED APRIL 22, 1971.


Summaries of

Lee v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia
Apr 22, 1971
181 S.E.2d 364 (Ga. 1971)
Case details for

Lee v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:LEE v. SMITH

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Apr 22, 1971

Citations

181 S.E.2d 364 (Ga. 1971)
181 S.E.2d 364

Citing Cases

Nolley v. Caldwell

6. A ground of petition for writ of habeas corpus which seeks to have reviewed the sufficiency of the…

Holcomb v. State

Both the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals of this State are now firm that the charge "alibi as a defense…