From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Rabadan

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 31, 2024
8:24-cv-01296-DOC-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)

Opinion

8:24-cv-01296-DOC-JDE

07-31-2024

Yeong Lee v. Anthony Rabadan et al


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR

LACK OF PROSECUTION

The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than August 14, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiffs, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above Dated:

X Plaintiff filing a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (FRCivP 55b) as to all defendants;
X Notice of Voluntary Dismissal (FRCivP 41)

It is plaintiff's responsibility to respond promptly to all Orders and to prosecute the action diligently, including filing proofs of service and stipulations extending time to respond. If necessary, plaintiffs must also pursue Rule 55 remedies promptly upon the default of any defendant. All stipulations affecting the progress of the case must be approved by the Court. Local Rule 7-1.

No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiffs is due.

Failure to respond by the date above will result in a Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution.


Summaries of

Lee v. Rabadan

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 31, 2024
8:24-cv-01296-DOC-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Lee v. Rabadan

Case Details

Full title:Yeong Lee v. Anthony Rabadan et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 31, 2024

Citations

8:24-cv-01296-DOC-JDE (C.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)