From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Grounds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-0464 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2015)

Opinion

No. 2:14-cv-0464 TLN KJN P

01-23-2015

GEORGE LEE, Plaintiff, v. R. GROUNDS, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

A recent court order was served on plaintiff's address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Local Rule 183(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: January 23, 2015

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Lee0464.33a


Summaries of

Lee v. Grounds

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2015
No. 2:14-cv-0464 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Lee v. Grounds

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE LEE, Plaintiff, v. R. GROUNDS, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2015

Citations

No. 2:14-cv-0464 TLN KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2015)