Opinion
Nos. 139807 and 139814.
July 30, 2010.
Leave to appeal denied at 485 Mich 1121. Reported below: 285 Mich App 51.
CORRIGAN, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration and states as follows: The defendants raise jurisprudentially • significant questions concerning the correctness of the Court of Appeals decision in this case, as I explained in my dissent to this Court's March 26, 2010 order denying the application for leave to appeal.
YOUNG, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration for the reasons set forth in Justice CORRIGAN'S dissenting statement in this case, 485 Mich 1121 (2010).
MARKMAN, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration, and grant leave to appeal, for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statement in this case, 485 Mich 1122 (2010).