From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Cooley

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Sep 28, 2010
CV 06-104 JVS (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2010)

Opinion


RONNIE LEE, Plaintiff, v. STEVE COOLEY, et al., Defendants. No. CV 06-104 JVS (FFM). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. September 28, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections thereto. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.

         IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing Plaintiff's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with prejudice and dismissing his state law claims for relief without prejudice.


Summaries of

Lee v. Cooley

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division
Sep 28, 2010
CV 06-104 JVS (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2010)
Case details for

Lee v. Cooley

Case Details

Full title:RONNIE LEE, Plaintiff, v. STEVE COOLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Sep 28, 2010

Citations

CV 06-104 JVS (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2010)