From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Cooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 12, 2021
CIVIL ACTION 1:18-00187-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Jan. 12, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION 1:18-00187-KD-MU

01-12-2021

DONALD D. LEE, Petitioner, v. MARY COOKS (Warden), Respondent.


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Order issued on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Petitioner Donald D. Lee's petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is DISMISSED as time-barred under Section 2244(d). Alternatively, Petitioner Donald D. Lee is not entitled to any relief in this Court because he has procedurally defaulted his claims pursuant to O'Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 842 (1999).

Further, Petitioner Donald D. Lee is not entitled to a certificate of appealability and, therefore, he is not entitled to appeal in forma pauperis.

DONE and ORDERED this the 12th day of January 2021.

/s/ Kristi K. DuBose

KRISTI K. DuBOSE

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lee v. Cooks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jan 12, 2021
CIVIL ACTION 1:18-00187-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Jan. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Lee v. Cooks

Case Details

Full title:DONALD D. LEE, Petitioner, v. MARY COOKS (Warden), Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 12, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION 1:18-00187-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Jan. 12, 2021)