From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. City of San Jose

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 31, 2024
23-cv-00778-PCP (VKD) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-00778-PCP (VKD)

07-31-2024

JIMMY K LEE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Defendants.


INTERIM ORDER RE JULY 30, 2024 DISCOVERY DISPUTE LETTER BRIEF

Re: Dkt. No. 78

Virginia K. DeMarchi United States Magistrate Judge

The parties filed a discovery dispute letter on July 30, 2024 concerning a further deposition of a non-party witness. The dispute letter appears to be incomplete, as it includes placeholders for the non-party witness to state his position and an unsigned signature block. See, e.g., Dkt. No. 78 at 7 (“Dr. John, please fill in yours.”). Plaintiff shall immediately serve a copy of the dispute letter on the non-party witness. If the non-party witness wishes the Court to consider his position regarding this dispute, he may file a statement of no more than 1,500 words by August 6, 2024 stating his position.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lee v. City of San Jose

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 31, 2024
23-cv-00778-PCP (VKD) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)
Case details for

Lee v. City of San Jose

Case Details

Full title:JIMMY K LEE, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 31, 2024

Citations

23-cv-00778-PCP (VKD) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 31, 2024)