Opinion
Case No. 2:07-cv-1230.
February 24, 2010
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Teresa Ruby's Motion In Limine Regarding Admissibility of Evidence of Events Occurring Before December 4, 2005 ("Ruby's First Motion in Limine") (Doc. # 294), Defendant City's Response in Opposition to Ruby's First Motion in Limine (Doc. # 297), Plaintiff Teresa Ruby's Motion In Limine Regarding the Admissibility of Evidence as to the City's Retaliation, Enforcement of the Directive, Drs. Clary and Fathman, and Officer John Sprague ("Ruby's Second Motion in Limine"), (Doc. # 295), and the City's Response in Opposition to Ruby's Second Motion in Limine (Doc. # 298).
Both of Ruby's motions are re-filings of documents she previously filed with this Court. (Docs. # 245, 260.) Defendant also previously filed responses in opposition to those motions (Docs. # 246, 273) and this Court issued decisions on the motions (Docs. # 251, 281). Although the Court recognizes that Defendant refined its arguments in its memoranda in opposition currently filed, the Court is unconvinced that its previous decisions on the motions in limine should be altered in any way. Accordingly, the Court incorporates in their entirety the previous decisions and for the same reasons articulated therein, the Court GRANTS Ruby's First Motion in Limine (Doc. # 294) and GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Ruby's Second Motion in Limine (Doc. # 295).