From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Carey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
No. 2:06-cv-0813 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:06-cv-0813 KJM CKD P

03-25-2013

GEORGE LEE, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN THOMAS CAREY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner represented by counsel. This case was closed on November 3, 2011 pursuant to a stipulation for voluntary dismissal filed by the parties on October 31, 2011. On November 26, 2012, plaintiff filed two documents in propria persona. Because plaintiff is represented by counsel in this case, all filings must be through counsel.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's November 26, 2012 motion (Dkt. No. 134) is DENIED without prejudice to refiling by counsel and plaintiff's November 26, 2012 filing (Dkt. No. 135) is disregarded.

________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Lee v. Carey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 25, 2013
No. 2:06-cv-0813 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Lee v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE LEE, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN THOMAS CAREY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

No. 2:06-cv-0813 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 25, 2013)