From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Able Body Labor

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Dec 4, 2008
Case No. 3:08cv387/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08cv387/MCR/EMT.

December 4, 2008


ORDER


This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated November 5, 2008 (Doc. 6). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lee v. Able Body Labor

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division
Dec 4, 2008
Case No. 3:08cv387/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Lee v. Able Body Labor

Case Details

Full title:MARJORIE L. LEE, Plaintiff, v. ABLE BODY LABOR, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division

Date published: Dec 4, 2008

Citations

Case No. 3:08cv387/MCR/EMT (N.D. Fla. Dec. 4, 2008)

Citing Cases

Hahn v. Broussard

Tom J. Russell, for appellants, cited: Gray v. McFarland, 29 Tex. 163; Wells v. Fairbanks, 5 Tex. 582 [ 5…

Thomson v. Findlater Hardware Co.

9. While an attorney has a lien on money collected by him for his client, he has no such lien for the debt in…