Opinion
20230055
09-14-2023
Sergio Ruiz Ledezma, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant. Amanda R. Engelstad, State's Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Appeal from the District Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Dann E. Greenwood, Judge. AFFIRMED.
Samuel A. Gereszek, Grand Forks, ND, for petitioner and appellant.
Amanda R. Engelstad, State's Attorney, Dickinson, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Sergio Ruiz Ledezma appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief.
[¶2] On appeal, Ruiz Ledezma argues the district court abused its discretion in denying his oral motions for continuance made at the post-conviction relief hearing. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Ruiz Ledezma's motions for continuance. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶3] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr