Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Ledezma-Cosino v. Sessions

857 F.3d 1042 (9th Cir. 2017)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Ledezma-Cosino v. Sessions

4 Citing cases

  1. United States v. Ramirez-Aleman

    21cr3403-BEN (S.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2022)   Cited 8 times

    Because Petitioner's equal protection fails under the ordinary rational basis test, this case provides no reason to question that longstanding approach.” 857 F.3d 1042, 1049 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc) (citations omitted). Six years

  2. Cortes v. Sessions

    Case No. 17-cv-01773-PJH (N.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2018)

    There is "nothing irrational about that legislative choice, which furthers the legitimate governmental interest in public safety." Ledezma-Cosino v. Sessions, 857 F.3d 1042, 1048 (9th Cir. 2017). Nor does it matter that the statute targets certain types of offenders and not others.

  3. Emami v. Nielsen

    365 F. Supp. 3d 1009 (N.D. Cal. 2019)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the doctrine of consular non-reviewability did not bar review of plaintiffs' claims that the government had failed to follow its own guidelines in adjudicating waiver applications

    The Court also notes, without firmly deciding the question at this time, that the equal protection claim would likely be subject to rational basis review. SeeLedezma-Cosino v. Sessions , 857 F.3d 1042, 1048 (9th Cir. 2017).

  4. Singh v. Cissna

    Case No. 1:18-cv-00782-SKO (E.D. Cal. Dec. 26, 2018)   Cited 1 times

    Harris v. McRae, 448 U.S. 297, 326 (1980). See Ledezma-Cosino v. Sessions, 857 F.3d 1042, 1048 (9th Cir. 2017); Hernandez-Mancilla v. Holder, 633 F.3d 1182, 1185 (9th Cir. 2011) ("We review equal protection challenges to federal immigration laws under the rational basis standard . . . ."). "A legislative classification must be wholly irrational to violate equal protection."