From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ledesma v. Barnes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 6, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2169 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-2169 MCE AC P

02-06-2013

JUAN MARCOS LEDESMA, Petitioner, v. RON BARNES, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 7, 2012, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ."

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion to dismiss within thirty days. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to file an opposition to the pending will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

_____________

ALLISON CLAIRE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Ledesma v. Barnes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 6, 2013
No. 2:12-cv-2169 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Ledesma v. Barnes

Case Details

Full title:JUAN MARCOS LEDESMA, Petitioner, v. RON BARNES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 6, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-2169 MCE AC P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 6, 2013)