From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lecointe v. Schyunberg

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 6, 1969
407 F.2d 59 (3d Cir. 1969)

Opinion

No. 17235.

Argued at Christiansted January 28, 1969.

Decided February 6, 1969.

Frank Padilla, Frederiksted, V.I., for appellant.

Ronald H. Tonkin, James, Hodge Tonkin, Christiansted, V.I., for appellees.

Before FREEDMAN, VAN DUSEN and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT


In this action for wrongful death brought under 5 V.I. Code, Section 76, the learned trial judge held the defendants liable under the doctrine of attractive nuisance as defined in Section 339 of the Restatement of Torts, Second, which, by 1 V.I. Code, Section 4, is the governing law in the Virgin Islands in the absence of local law to the contrary.

The evidence, which we have fully reviewed, supports the finding that the death of plaintiff's three-year old son was the proximate result of the negligence of the defendants in the maintenance on their premises of the cistern in which the child was found drowned.

The learned trial judge, in awarding damages, adhered to the rule of Williams v. Dowling, 318 F.2d 642, 4 V.I. 465, (C.A.3, 1963). The award is within the allowable range and we cannot declare it excessive.

The judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Lecointe v. Schyunberg

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Feb 6, 1969
407 F.2d 59 (3d Cir. 1969)
Case details for

Lecointe v. Schyunberg

Case Details

Full title:Mr. Mrs. Bellot LECOINTE v. Hugo L. SCHYUNBERG, Agnes Petersen, Arthur…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Feb 6, 1969

Citations

407 F.2d 59 (3d Cir. 1969)

Citing Cases

Bergen v. Bergen

"The rules of the common law, as expressed in the restatements of the law approved by the American Law…