Opinion
Submitted May 31, 1929 —
Decided February 3, 1930.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 7 N.J. Mis. R. 124.
For the appellant, Wolber Gilhooly.
For the respondent, Joseph Kraemer.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, KALISCH, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 9.
For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, BLACK, CAMPBELL, VAN BUSKIRK, JJ. 4.