From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leath v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Oct 11, 2023
No. 86400-COA (Nev. App. Oct. 11, 2023)

Opinion

86400-COA

10-11-2023

BRANDON MARCUS LEATH, Appellant v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Gibbons, C .J.

Brandon Marcus Leath appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion to modify or correct an illegal sentence filed on January 25, 2023. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michelle Leavitt, Judge.

In his motion, Leath claimed that counsel was ineffective for failing to properly handle plea negotiations and for failing to present his psychological evaluation at sentencing. "[A] motion to modify a sentence is limited in scope to sentences based on mistaken assumptions about a defendant's criminal record which work to the defendant's extreme detriment." Edwards u. State,. 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). A motion to correct an illegal sentence may only challenge the facial legality of the sentence: either the district court was without jurisdiction to impose a sentence or the sentence was imposed in excess of the statutory maximum. Id. However, such a motion cannot be used to challenge the validity of the conviction or sentence based on alleged errors that occurred at trial or sentencing. Id. The district court may summarily deny a motion to modify or correct an illegal sentence if the motion raises issues that fall outside of the very narrow scope of issues permissible in such motions. Id. at 708 n.2, 918 P.2d at 32511.2.

Without considering the merits of Leath's claims, we conclude they fall outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to modify or correct an illegal sentence. Therefore, we conclude the district court did not err by denying Leath's motion, and we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRM ED.

We have reviewed all documents Leath has filed in this matter, and we conclude no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent Leath attempts to present claims or facts in his filings on appeal that were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we decline to consider them in the first instance. See McNelton v. State, 115 Nev. 396, 415-16, 990 P.2d 1263, 1275-76 (1999).

Bulla, J., Westbrook, J.

Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge


Summaries of

Leath v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Oct 11, 2023
No. 86400-COA (Nev. App. Oct. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Leath v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON MARCUS LEATH, Appellant v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of Nevada

Date published: Oct 11, 2023

Citations

No. 86400-COA (Nev. App. Oct. 11, 2023)