recognizing that shared monopoly theory was "novel" and holding that no § 2 claim was stated "in this case," but declining to adopt a general rule
Summary of this case from In re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust LitigationNo. 88-785.
January 9, 1989.
C.A. 10th Cir. Motion of Alliance for Fair Competition for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 849 F. 2d 1330.
recognizing that shared monopoly theory was "novel" and holding that no § 2 claim was stated "in this case," but declining to adopt a general rule
Summary of this case from In re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigationdescribing empirical studies in Georgia and Mississippi showing that jurors believe criminals become eligible for parole much sooner than they actually do
Summary of this case from Myres v. StateFull title:LEASE LIGHTS, INC., Et Al. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 9, 1989
The details are contained in the opinion of the California Supreme Court affirming the conviction and…
Williams v. StateBecause the jury did not specify which alternative theory it relied upon in convicting appellant of murder,…