From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leanoz v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 16, 2015
1:15-cv-00365-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2015)

Opinion

          SHELLEY G. BRYANT, AMANDA B. WHITTEN, BRYANT WHITTEN, LLP, Fresno, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiff MARYHELEN LEANOZ.

          DANIELL OCHS, BECKI D. GRAHAM, DANIELLE A. HINTON, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE PER FED. R. CIV. P. 41(A)(1)(A)(ii) (Doc. 17)

          SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff Maryhelen Leanoz and Defendant Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., by their respective counsel, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, stipulate and agree that the above-captioned matter may be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, and with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         Based on the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The entire matter is DISMISSED with prejudice as to all Defendants; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Leanoz v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 16, 2015
1:15-cv-00365-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Leanoz v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MARYHELEN LEANOZ, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a Delaware…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 16, 2015

Citations

1:15-cv-00365-SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2015)