From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leading Edge Mktg. v. The Individuals

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Nov 22, 2022
No. 21-23480-CIV-WILLIAMS (S.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2022)

Summary

finding defendants have been “properly served . . . with the [c]omplaint and summonses via email and Internet publication, consistent with the Court's Order Authorizing Alternate Service”

Summary of this case from Chenming Zhou v. The Individuals, P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule “A”

Opinion

21-23480-CIV-WILLIAMS

11-22-2022

LEADING EDGE MARKETING INC., Plaintiff, v. THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A,” Defendants.


ORDER

KATHLEEN M. WILLIAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Chris M. McAliley's Report and Recommendation (“Report”) on Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Final Default Judgment against Certain Defendants(“Motion”) (DE 83). (DE 103.) In the Report, Magistrate Judge McAliley recommends that Plaintiff's Motion be GRANTED. Defendants filed no response to the Motion. Additionally, the Parties did not file any objections to Judge McAliley's Report, and the time period to file objections has passed.

The “Certain Defendants” are the Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule “A” to the Amended Complaint numbered 1, 2, 5, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 18-22, 24, 26-39, 41, 43-47, 49, 51-57, 59-87, 89-92, 94, 96, 99, 102, 103, 104-106, 108, 109, 111, 113, 115, 116, 119-122, 126, 129, 130, 133, 134-137, 140, 142, 143, 145-148, 151, 153-155, 157, 159, 161, 162, 164-166, 169, 171, 172, 174, 176-179, 189, 191, 192, 195, 196, 198, 199, 204-209, 211, 215, 216, 218-220, 223, 224, 226, 227, 234, 237-249, 251-254, 256, 257, 259, 260-272, 275-286, and 288 (“ Defaulting Defendants ”).

Upon an independent review of the Report, the record, and applicable case law, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Report (DE 103) is AFFIRMED AND

ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Final Default Judgment (DE 83) is GRANTED. The Court will separately enter Final Default Judgment.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Leading Edge Mktg. v. The Individuals

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Nov 22, 2022
No. 21-23480-CIV-WILLIAMS (S.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2022)

finding defendants have been “properly served . . . with the [c]omplaint and summonses via email and Internet publication, consistent with the Court's Order Authorizing Alternate Service”

Summary of this case from Chenming Zhou v. The Individuals, P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule “A”
Case details for

Leading Edge Mktg. v. The Individuals

Case Details

Full title:LEADING EDGE MARKETING INC., Plaintiff, v. THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Nov 22, 2022

Citations

No. 21-23480-CIV-WILLIAMS (S.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2022)

Citing Cases

The Smiley Co. SPRL v. The Individuals, P'ships

Plaintiff effectuated service of process in the instant case because it complied with Judge Scola's Order…

Shenzhen Hengzechen Tech. Co. v. The Individuals, P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A

Because Plaintiff complied with Judge Scola's Order [ECF No. 17] authorizing alternative service of process,…